PAUL LANKSYI met Randy in the fall of 1987, when I visited Cal Arts. He was one of my private composition students. I sort of doubt that I taught him very much. He knew what he wanted to do, and he knew how to do it. I was thrilled to have a student like this, and gave him all the encouragement and enthusiasm I could. This was particularly easy since the piece he was working on at the time was such an utter knockout. In fact, the piece changed my life. It's called Happily Ever After. I'm sure most of you know it, and if you don't you should.
The piece is made of recordings of Randy's friends and family telling stories which need only begin with 'Once upon a time' and end with 'Happily Ever After' -- the rest is up to them. What is so remarkable about the piece is not only the extraordinary way it works, musically speaking, but also the wonderful way in which it enfolds Randy's personal life into the experience. I feel as if I know a lot about all of the speakers on the tape...
The piece persuaded me that music can and should be about the way we live our daily lives, and reflect the intensity of the experience. Since that time I've played the piece for people all over the world. I was in Australia the following summer and played it for folks there. The young people in particular loved it and said that they felt that they had gotten a wonderful insight into American culture. The piece also kept me company in the hospital for a few nights during some minor surgery. I listened to it many times. I make sure that each generation of my graduate students at Princeton hears it, and they always love it. It should be on a CD, and I'd like to suggest that his friends work towards that goal -- I'll be glad to help.
Our weekly sessions were constantly interesting. I remember one in particular in which Randy gave me a lesson on the joys of Bob Dylan, whom I professed not to properly appreciate. With appropriate irony, I came to think of Randy every time I hear Dylan. Randy was not an eccentric composer (even though he wrote a piece using billiard balls to play a piano). He was just an honest composer. The work he did came directly from his perception of who he was, and what he wanted to say. We're all the more fortunate because he was so good at expressing these things, and what he had to say was, and is, such a joy to hear.
We'd stayed in touch since that time, he came to visit a few years ago, and we'd been in contact electronically in recent years. But, I think that because of the profound effect his piece had on me, as well as the utter sincerity, honesty and decency of his personality, that Randy became, for me, one of those people whose image flits across consciousness almost every day. I bet that in one way or another I have thought of him daily since we met in 1987. And, I'm sure that he will continue to be a presence in my thoughts.